Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Tenggeer Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Tenggeer Fm base reconstruction

Tenggeer Fm


Period: 
Cretaceous

Age Interval: 
Hauterivian-Aptian, (17d)


Province: 
Inner Mongolia

Type Locality and Naming

Erlian Basin. [NOTE: Kosenko et al., 2021, did not separate a Tenggeer Fm in their synthesis.]


Lithology and Thickness

Lower Tenggeer is mainly mudstone; Upper Tengger is interbedded mudstone and sandstone. "The Lower Tenggeer Formation with a maximum thickness of ca. 1,250 m, contains the most important source rocks of the Erlian Basin. The formation contacts the Upper Aershan Formation with an angular unconformity (named as T8 in seismic reflection sections), and is characterized by thick-bedded lacustrine mudstone, interbedded with thin layers of carbonaceous mudstone, siltstone, sandstone, and intermediate-basic volcanic rocks. In some local areas, this formation is a typical fining-upward sequence, made up of conglomerate- and pebbly sandstone-dominated basal beds and mudstone- and sandstone-dominated upper beds. The Upper Tenggeer Formation with a maximum thickness of ca. 1,350 m, contacts the Lower Tenggeer Formation with an angular unconformity (named as T6 in seismic reflection sections), and is a fining-upward sequence, containing a alluvial fan–fluvial pebbly sandstone- and sandstone-dominated lower succession and a lacustrine mudstone- and siltstone-dominated upper succession in most sub-basins of the Erlian Basin. In some sub-basins, such as the Abei-Anan Sag, the coarse-grained lower succession of the Upper Tenggeer Formation was absent, and the fine-grained upper succession rested on the Lower Tenggeer Formation directly."


Lithology Pattern: 
Clayey sandstone


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The formation contacts the Upper Aershan Fm with an angular unconformity (named as T8 in seismic reflection sections).

Upper contact

Saihan Fm rests on the Upper Tenggeer Fm with an angular unconformity (named as T3 in seismic reflection sections.

Regional extent

Erlian Basin


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[115.74,44.2],[116.35,44.19],[116.59,43.98],[116.48,43.86],[116.16,43.69],[115.71,43.44],[115.4,43.13],[115.2,42.62],[114.81,42.47],[114.04,42.21],[113.59,42.09],[113.04,42.06],[112.2,41.89],[111.46,41.83],[111.3,42.08],[111.47,42.19],[111.75,42.51],[112.19,42.7],[112.71,42.77],[113.02,42.98],[113.5,43.33],[114.69,43.93],[115.74,44.2]]]]}}

Fossils


Age 

Guo, Z.X. et al. (2019,) indicate the Lower Tenggeer spans Hauterivian to mid-Aptian; and Upper Tenggeer spans only early-Late Aptian. [The summary chart in Guo et al. (2019; Fig. 14) based on their dating is 132 to 120 Ma, and 120 to 115 Ma, respectively; hence, using GTS2020, the age span implies earliest Hauterivian to latest Barremian, and Early through Middle Aptian, respectively.]However, the entire Bayanhua Gr is placed into only the Aptian-Albian by Kosenko et al. (2021), who did not reference Guo et al.'s study. Therefore, until this conflict is resolved, the age model for the Erlian Basin stratigraphy by Guo et al. (2019) is used here.

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Hauterivian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.1

    Beginning date (Ma): 
131.99

    Ending stage: 
Aptian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.8

    Ending date (Ma):  
114.84

Depositional setting


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

Guo, Z.X. et al. (2019, Early Cretaceous tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Erlian Basin, NE China, Marine and Petroleumm Geology, 110: 539-564)